Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Did Israel violate the Genocide Convention by forcing contraceptives on Ethiopian women?

Did Israel violate the Genocide Convention by forcing contraceptives on Ethiopian women?

The journalistic investigation was prompted by a precipitious decline in the birth rate among Ethiopian women in Israel:
About six weeks ago, on an Educational Television program journalist Gal Gabbay revealed the results of interviews with 35 Ethiopian immigrants. The women’s testimony could help explain the almost 50-percent decline over the past 10 years in the birth rate of Israel’s Ethiopian community.

Saturday, 26 January 2013

France, Qatar, and the New World Disorder

France, Qatar, and the New World Disorder

France, Qatar, and the New World Disorder

By Gearóid Ó Colmáin 

January 26, 2013 "Information Clearing House" - According to investigative journalist Silvia Cattori, the barbaric bombing of Aleppo University on January 15 has been officially claimed by the terrorist group the Al Nousra Front. This confirmation should not come as a surprise to those who have been following closely events in the Levant since March 17, 2011, when unknown snipers opened fire in the Southern Syrian town of Deraa killing several policemen and innocent protestors.

Sunday, 20 January 2013

The Radicalization of Martin Luther King

The Radicalization of Martin Luther King

The African-American Army

The African-American Army
January 20, 2013 "Information Clearing House" - Escaped slaves fought on the British side, which promised to free them, during the American war for independence for white men.  But nobody liked to talk about that much after the French won the war, although -- come to think of it -- nobody much likes to talk about the French winning the war, or for that matter about the big losers being, not the British but the Native Americans. 

Yvonne Ridley : The Algerian Kidnappers and the Case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

Yvonne Ridley : The Algerian Kidnappers and the Case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui
The case of the mother-of-three is well known in every household in Pakistan from the most religious to the most secular … the majority of which have been demanding her repatriation for years. Now she is known as the Daughter of the Nation although her story has travelled well beyond Pakistan’s borders.
Thousands of Muslim children have been named after her because of all that she has come to symbolise. Everything that she represents stems from the injustices created by America’s War on Terror … the kidnaps, renditions, torture, rape and waterboarding.
The brilliant academic, educated in top US universities, is tonight languishing in a Texan jail serving an 86 year sentence after being found guilty of trying to kill American soldiers.
The fact they shot her at close range and nearly killed her is often overlooked.

Saturday, 19 January 2013

Pepe Escobar : Burn, burn - Africa's Afghanistan

Pepe Escobar : Burn, burn - Africa's Afghanistan
Salafi-jihadis in Mali have got a huge problem: they chose the wrong battlefield. If this was Syria, they would have been showered by now with weapons, logistical bases, a London-based "observatory", hours of YouTube videos and all-out diplomatic support by the usual suspects of US, Britain, Turkey, the Gulf petromonarchies and - oui, monsieur - France itself. 

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Disturbing new video of Israeli Jews assaulting Africans in Tel Aviv on New Year’s Eve | The Electronic Intifada

Disturbing new video of Israeli Jews assaulting Africans in Tel Aviv on New Year’s Eve | The Electronic Intifada
A disturbing new video by David Sheen shot on New Year’s Eve on the streets of Tel Aviv shows Israelis rallying against Africans and then Jewish youths assaulting, insulting and humiliating African people – presumably identifiable only by the color of their skin.

The War Against the Shia: The West's Strange Bedfellows

The War Against the Shia: The West's Strange Bedfellows
January 14, 2013 "Information Clearing House" - It is a ferocious war waged by assassination, massacre, imprisonment and persecution that has killed tens of thousands of people. But non-Muslims – and many Muslims – scarcely notice this escalating conflict that pits Shia minority against Sunni majority.
The victims of the war in recent years are mostly Shia. Last week a suicide bomber walked into a snooker club in a Shia district of Quetta in Pakistan and blew himself up. Rescue workers and police were then caught by the blast from a car bomb that exploded 10 minutes later. In all, 82 people were killed and 121 injured. “It was like doomsday,” said a policeman. “There were bodies everywhere.”
Responsibility for the bombing was claimed by the banned Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a Sunni fundamentalist group behind many such attacks that killed 400 Shia in Pakistan last year.
The dead in Quetta come from the Shia Hazara community, many of whom migrated from Afghanistan in the last century. “They live in a state of siege,” says Ali Dayan Hasan, of Human Rights Watch. “Stepping out of the ghetto means risking death. Everyone has failed them – the security forces, the government, the judiciary.” In this they are little different from the 30 million Shia in Pakistan who are increasingly beleaguered and afraid in the midst of a rising tide of anti-Shia sectarianism.
The atrocity in Quetta will soon be forgotten outside the area ,but the victims were not the only Shia community to come under attack last week. In Bahrain, where the Shia majority is ruled by the Sunni al-Khalifa royal family, the high court confirmed prison sentences – including eight life sentences – on 20 activists who took part in the pro-democracy protests in 2011. This happened even though the original sentences were passed by military courts using evidence extracted by torture.
The sectarian nature of what is happening in Bahrain has never been in doubt. At the height of the crackdown the Bahraini security forces bulldozed 35 Shia mosques, husseiniyas (religious meeting houses) and holy places. The authorities claimed that they were inspired by a sudden enthusiasm to enforce building regulations despite the political turmoil.
Sunni-Shia friction has a long history but took its most vicious form after the overthrow of the Shah by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979 and the creation of a revolutionary theocratic Shia state in Iran. The Iran-Iraq war of 1980-88 appeared to end Iranian hopes of spreading the revolution to its neighbour, but after the US invasion of 2003 – to the dismay of the White House and to the horror of Saudi Arabia – Iraq became a Shia-run state. “We are the first Arab state to be controlled by the Shia since the Fatimids ran Egypt 800 years ago,” one Iraqi Shia activist exulted to me at the time.
As a result of the Sunni-Shia civil war in Iraq in 2006-07, Baghdad became an overwhelmingly Shia city. The Sunni in the capital increasingly lived in ghettos. The government, army, police and judiciary came under Shia control. Across the Middle East, the Shia appeared to be on a roll, exemplified by Hezbollah’s success in withstanding the Israeli attack on Lebanon in 2006. In Afghanistan the traditionally down-trodden Shia Hazara community flourished after of the defeat of the Taliban. However, the overall extent of the Shia success was exaggerated: in most Muslim countries the Shia form a vulnerable minority. In the last two years the Shia revolution has been succeeded by a Sunni counter-offensive. The Shia democratic uprising was crushed in Bahrain, and Hezbollah wonders how it will fare if, in future, it faces a hostile Sunni government in Damascus. Until a few months ago the sectarian and ethnic balance of power in Iraq looked stable, but prophecies of a Sunni takeover in Syria are having destabilising consequences.
The uprising in Syria is not so far wholly sectarian, but is on its way to becoming so. Shia and Alawite villagers flee as the rebel Free Syrian Army moves in. A video posted on YouTube shows rebels ransacking and burning a Shia husseiniya outside Idlib in north-west Syria.
All this leaves the US and its Western allies with new dilemmas. In 2003 the US found that in Iraq it had opened the door to Iran by overthrowing Saddam Hussein. Its solution was to try to keep power itself in Iraq through an old-fashioned occupation, but this failed disastrously. From 2007 it adopted a new strategy known by some in the White House as the “redirection”, making US policy more militantly anti-Iranian and pro-Saudi and, therefore, inevitably more pro-Sunni and anti-Shia.
In a revelatory piece in the New Yorker in 2007, Seymour Hersh described how this “redirection” has moved “the United States closer to an open confrontation with Iran, and, in parts of the region, propelled it into a widening sectarian conflict between Shia and Sunni Muslims”. Iran, strengthened by the outcome of the US invasion of Iraq, was demonised as a greater threat than the Sunni radicals. Its allies, Hezbollah and Syria, were targeted for clandestine operations. Hersh says “a by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to al-Qa’ida.”
In fact the main al-Qa’ida franchises in Iraq and Pakistan have always been more enthusiastic about killing Shia than killing Americans. The success of the Arab Spring movements was in part owing to the new willingness of Washington to tolerate the Muslim Brotherhood taking power, judging that this would not open the door to jihadis seeking to wage holy war.
The logic of the US policy of covertly co-operating with fundamentalist Sunni groups has reached its logical conclusion. There is now “good” al-Qa’ida on our side and “bad” al-Qa’ida fighting on theirs. In Syria, the former operates under the name of the al-Nusra Front, labelled by the US as the Syrian branch al-Qa’ida, and is the main fighting force of the rebel National Coalition. This is recognised by the US, Britain and many others as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people.
Meanwhile, in Mali an advance last week by the forces of the local al-Qa’ida franchise, of whom we don’t approve, led to immediate action by the French army and air force against them. The hypocrisy of it all is baffling.
This article was originally posted at Counterpunch

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

“Jews for Palestinian Right of Return” statement backs single state and refugees’ right to go home | The Electronic Intifada

“Jews for Palestinian Right of Return” statement backs single state and refugees’ right to go home | The Electronic Intifada
The following statement, dated 1 January 2013, is issued by Jews for the Palestinian Right of Return. The initial signers are listed below along with a link for those who wish to sign on.
“For Palestinians, the right to return home and the right to live in dignity and equality in their own land are not any less important than the right to live free of military occupation.”Prof. Saree Makdisi

In shock reversal, Abe Foxman's ADL speaks out against rights for Arab Jews | The Electronic Intifada

In shock reversal, Abe Foxman's ADL speaks out against rights for Arab Jews | The Electronic Intifada
Reversing a long-standing position, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), one of the most influential Zionist organizations in the United States, has come out against recognition of the rights of Arab Jews.
In a 7 January press release, the ADL
welcomed the resignation of a close adviser to Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi who last week called for Jews of Egyptian descent to return to Egypt and “leave Israel.”
The statement also condemned the advisor, Essam el-Erian’s, criticisms of Israel.
“This broad-brush negative stereotype of Jews by a senior Egyptian official was inappropriate, unacceptable and raises serious questions about the attitudes of some of Egypt’s leaders towards Jews,” the press release quoted ADL National Director Abraham Foxman as saying.

Watch: Banned Balad election ad has Israel's racist politicians dancing to Arab rhythm | The Electronic Intifada

Watch: Banned Balad election ad has Israel's racist politicians dancing to Arab rhythm | The Electronic Intifada
(David Silverman / Getty Images)

Watch: Banned Balad election ad has Israel’s racist politicians dancing to Arab rhythm

Balad, a party representing Palestinian citizens of Israel, has released an election ad that shows some of Israel’s most notoriously racist politicians, including recently resigned foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, dancing to an Arabic rhythm.
The ad was banned from radio and television broadcast by Israel’s election commission.

Friday, 4 January 2013

Arab Slave Traders Supporting Democracy in Syria?:

Arab Slave Traders Supporting Democracy in Syria?:
Arab Slave Traders Supporting Democracy in Syria?:

Recent legal moves by the governments of Ethiopia, Indonesia and the Philippines to protect their nationals working in the Persian Gulf Arab states point to this harrowing fact: the Arab slave trade in foreign workers is alive and well.

By Finian Cunningham
January 03, 2013 "Information Clearing House" - Recent legal moves by the governments of Ethiopia, Indonesia and the Philippines to protect their nationals working in the Persian Gulf Arab states point to this harrowing fact: the Arab slave trade in foreign workers is alive and well.
Rights groups estimate that there are up to 15 million migrant workers located in the Persian Gulf Arab countries of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Paid pittance wages and subsisting in dirty, overcrowded dwellings, these workers provide the labour backbone of the Arab oil economies.

While the gas and oil sheikhdoms of Qatar and the UAE boast of gleaming skyscrapers and some of the highest per capita incomes in the world, the dirty secret of their seeming success is the massive immiseration and degradation of millions of human beings from Asia and Africa.

Yet, we are led to believe by Western mainstream media that these same Arab monarchies are at the forefront of supporting Western governments in their calls for democratic and human rights reforms in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Recent New Year celebrations around the world featured a spectacular fireworks display from world’s tallest building, the Burj Khalifa, in Dubai. When the futuristic tower was officially opened last May, its inauguration was marred when an Indian worker leapt to his death. The tragedy was scarcely reported then. But it represents just one of hundreds of such suicides committed by foreign workers across the Persian Gulf Arab emirates and sheikhdoms. Many other such deaths are caused by willful neglect and brutality at the hands of despotic employers.
 
Also last year, an Indonesian housemaid was beheaded by the authorities in Saudi Arabia for killing her “madam”. The housemaid claimed she had suffered years of abuse from her employer. The distraught workers couldn’t take it any more and ended up attacking her tormentor with a cleaver. In another under-reported case, an Ethiopian “house servant” was tortured to death by her sponsor in the UAE.
This is just a glimpse of the routine misery that foreign workers are subjected to in these Arab states.

It is hard to verify the numbers, but it is estimated that thousands of other such foreign workers are rotting away in prisons in these Arab countries, accused of crimes and misdemeanors by their employers. Misdemeanors can include workers complaining about harsh conditions or wages with-held, or absconding from their workplaces. These latter workers are termed “runaways” and it is not uncommon to see posters in public places offering rewards for helping to track down the absentees. This is slavery in all but name.

The unfortunate masses come from India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Ethiopia and Sudan and work as housemaids and waitresses and in construction. All of the gleaming mirrored facades that offer luxury holiday destinations for rich Westerners and Arabs are built by labourers who earn as little as $150 a month. Many of these toilers die from horrific industrial injuries or heat exhaustion due to minimal safety standards. At the end of their 12-hour working day, they are herded into trucks to be taken back to their squalid compounds.

A global network of recruiting agents and employment sponsors conspire to deliver these workers into barbaric working conditions that are nothing more than indentured slavery. Mostly, the workers are deceived by promises of decent wages and conditions, only to end up living hellish lives of oppression, ill health and poverty at the mercy of unscrupulous “employers” - or more correctly “slave owners”.

Many of the migrant workers find themselves as unwitting victims in a rampant sex industry. Compared with the grinding poverty of the Indian subcontinent or East Africa, many women are lured by the promise of working as a waitress in a glitzy Qatari or Dubai hotel, only to find that they are earmarked to become prostitutes for wealthy Arab and Western customers.

Various euphemisms are used. “Guest workers”, “expatriate labourers”, “migrant workers”, “foreign nationals”. These euphemisms, as with the terms “employer” and “sponsor”, are used to conceal the fact that the system of labour underpinning the Persian Gulf Arab economies is a form of modern slavery. The workers are denied any legal rights and often deprived of the measly wages owed to them. On arrival in the Gulf states, their passports are confiscated. They have no means of redress and thus become nothing more than human chattel. Too often, their only way out of appalling misery is to take their own lives.

Historically, the Arab slave trade was extant from the 7th to the 19th Century. It was one of world’s biggest and oldest slave trades. It predates the European-American trade by at least 700 years. Where the latter is reckoned to have enslaved between 11 and 15 million Africans, mainly from the continent’s West coast, the Arab traders are estimated to have consigned many more millions to bondage from East Africa.
Marauding Africa’s East coast and centered around Zanzibar, women and young girls were snatched from what is now Mozambique, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan and sold as servants and sex slaves into the Persian Gulf. The Arab slave trade of antiquity officially ended in the 19th century. And in 1948, the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights banished all forms of slavery.
However, what we can tell from the systematic dire conditions of expatriate workers in the Persian Gulf Arab economies today is that the Arab slave trade is still alive and well, affecting millions of individuals.

In these feudalistic monarchies, which Washington and London fawn over as “strategic allies”, so important is slavery to the economies that the foreign workers outnumber the national populations. In Bahrain and the UAE, foreign workers count for more than half the resident population. In Qatar, some three-quarters of the populace are migrant workers.

This points up a deeply problematic contradiction for the rulers. While the wealth of these despots is undoubtedly increased by the super-exploitation of dirt-cheap foreign labour, their own populations are festering with unemployment. In Saudi Arabia, for example, unemployment among young Saudis is between 30 and 50 per cent, yet the kingdom employs an army of some nine million foreign workers. This huge discrepancy is a major grievance among Saudis fuelling anti-monarchy protests over the past two years. Unemployment and poverty is of course a driving cause of resentment among Bahrainis against the Khalifa regime, which has for decades relied on the import of cheap labour to shore up its crony economy.

Another glaring contradiction is the claim by these same Gulf monarchies that they are supporting a democratic uprising in Syria, as in Libya last year. So there you have it. Modern Arab slave-trading regimes standing up for human rights in other Arab countries. That’s just too absurd for words.
Finian Cunningham, originally from Belfast, Ireland, was born in 1963. He is a prominent expert in international affairs. The author and media commentator was expelled from Bahrain in June 2011 for his critical journalism in which he highlighted human rights violations by the Western-backed regime. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism.
This article was originally posted at Press TV

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

Obama authorizes five more years of warrantless wiretapping — RT

Obama authorizes five more years of warrantless wiretapping — RT
Federal detectives won’t need a warrant to eavesdrop on the emails and phone calls of Americans for another five years. President Obama reauthorized an intelligence gathering bill on Sunday that puts national security over constitutional rights.
President Barack Obama inked his name over the weekend to an extension of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, a George W. Bush-era legislation that has allowed the government expansive spy powers that has been considered by some to be dragnet surveillance.
FISA, or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was first signed into law in the 1970s in order to put into place rules regarding domestic spying within the United States. Upon the passing of the FAA in 2008, however, the online and over-the-phone activities of Americans became subject to sweeping, warrantless wiretapping in instances where investigators reasonably suspect US citizens to be engaged in conversation with persons located outside of the country.
Congress had only up until the end of 2012 to either reauthorize FISA and the FAA, or let the bill expire. Despite a large grassroots campaign from privacy advocates and civil liberties organization to ensure the acts would fade from history, though, the Senate approved a five-year extension of the legislation on Friday. Just two days later, Pres. Obama signed his name to the act, opening up the inboxes and phone records of US citizens to the federal government until at least 2018.
Although on the books since 2008, the FAA has come under increased criticism this year thanks to efforts from a select group of lawmakers who have adamantly demanded answers about a program largely considered to be cloaked in secrecy. In May, Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Mark Udall (D-CO) sent a letter to the National Security Agency asking for an estimate of how many Americans have been targeted since the FAA went on the books. In response, Inspector General I. Charles McCullough said honoring that request would be “beyond the capacity” of the office, and that “dedicating sufficient additional resources would likely impede the NSA’s mission.”
“If no one will even estimate how many Americans have had their communications collected under this law then it is all the more important that Congress act to close the ‘back door searches’ loophole, to keep the government from searching for Americans’ phone calls and emails without a warrant,” Wyden, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told Wired.com’s Danger Room.
Although Americans cannot be specifically targeted under the FAA without getting the approval of a select panel of FISA judges, the warrantless monitoring of messages involving anyone outside of the country can easily collect collateral information about US citizens.
Speaking on the Senate floor on Friday before the FISA vote, Wyden warned, “You can’t just go out checking everybody in sight with the prospect of that maybe there’s someone who’s done something wrong.”
“Government officials may only search someone’s house if they have evidence that someone is breaking the law and they show the evidence to a judge to get an individual warrant,” he said.
Despite attempts from Wyden and others to overturn the FAA, though, it cleared the Senate by a vote of 73-23 on Friday and was signed by Pres. Obama in Washington just two days later.

When Fracking Came to Suburban Texas

When Fracking Came to Suburban Texas
January 01, 2013 "The Guardian" - -The corner of Goldenrod and Western streets, with its grid of modest homes, could be almost any suburb that went up in a hurry – except of course for the giant screeching oil rig tearing up the earth and making the pavement shudder underfoot.
Fracking, the technology that opened up America's vast deposits of unconventional oil and gas, has moved beyond remote locations and landed at the front door, with oil operations now planned or under way in suburbs, mid-sized towns and large metropolitan areas.
Some cities have moved to limit fracking or ban it outright – even in the heart of oil and gas country. Tulsa, Oklahoma, which once billed itself as the oil capital of the world, banned fracking inside city limits. The authorities in Dallas last week blocked what would have been the first natural gas well in town. The town of Longmont, just outside Denver, meanwhile, is fighting off attempts by industry groups to overturn a fracking ban.
But Gardendale, a suburb of 1,500 people near the hub of the west Texas oil industry, exists in a legal and political environment in which there are seemingly few restrictions on fracking, even inside city limits. For residents here, fracking is part of daily life.
"You can hear it, you can smell it, and you are always breathing it. It's just like being behind a car exhaust," said Debbie Leverett, during a tour of the area last October organised by the Society of Environmental Journalists. "All of your senses change."
Over the last few years oil companies have drilled 51 wells in Gardendale, an area that covers about 11 square miles – and that's just the start.

Obama authorizes five more years of warrantless wiretapping — RT

Obama authorizes five more years of warrantless wiretapping — RT

The National Security State’s Embrace of Dictatorships

The National Security State’s Embrace of Dictatorships
The National Security State’s Embrace of Dictatorships

By Jacob G. Hornberger

December 29, 2012 "
fff" --  The New York Times published an article on December 25 that exposes a harsh reality about U.S. foreign policy to mainstream Americans. The article, entitled “Bahrain, a Brutal Ally,” focuses on one of the principal dark sides of U.S. foreign policy: the U.S. national-security state’s ardent support of brutal dictatorships, this one being Bahrain.
Why is the U.S. government supporting the brutal dictatorship in Bahrain while opposing, say, the brutal dictatorship in Syria?
The answer is very simple. The dictatorship in Bahrain, where the U.S. military has one of its largest naval bases, is pro-U.S. The dictatorship in Syria is independent of the U.S. government at best and anti-U.S. at worst.

Syria Rebels 'Beheaded a Christian and Fed Him to the Dogs'

Syria Rebels 'Beheaded a Christian and Fed Him to the Dogs'
Fact or Propaganda?
Syria Rebels 'Beheaded Man and Fed Him to the Dogs'

Christian Andrei Arbashe, 38, was kidnapped and beheaded by rebel fighters in northern town of Ras Al-Ayn on the Turkish border
News came as pro-government forces celebrated their victory against rebels near Aleppo Airport

By Nick Fagge

December 31, 2012 "
Daily Mail" - -Syrian rebels beheaded a Christian man and fed his body to dogs, according to a nun who says the West is ignoring atrocities committed by Islamic extremists.

The nun said taxi driver Andrei Arbashe, 38, was kidnapped after his brother was heard complaining that fighters against the ruling regime behaved like bandits.